Noora Alternative: Public Roadmap and Voting for SaaS

Looking for a noora alternative when the job is a public roadmap plus voting, not a second copy of the same board? Noora (noorahq.com, Noora AB) is a hosted SaaS feedback board: customers vote, the roadmap fills as statuses change, and a changelog can notify the people who asked. Feedjolt is a hosted human-in-the-loop (HITL) voting board with public feedback, voting, a public roadmap, a changelog, and MCP so an agent can propose and a human decides. Same job, different shape. This page is the dated plan gate. Homepage only: https://www.feedjolt.com/?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=seo-noora-alternative.

The quotes below come from Noora’s public homepage, about page, Canny compare page, and pricing page on 2026-09-30 (Madrid). Pricing HTML was fetched the same day from noorahq.com/pricing. Re-open those pages the week you buy. If a price or a plan name is not on the page that day, treat it as unknown. Do not import a figure from a roundup. For the roadmap and close-the-loop side of the same job, see public roadmap tools for SaaS and a changelog that closes the loop with voters.

What Noora optimizes for

A noorahq feedback board is where SaaS users post requests, vote, and talk. On 2026-09-30 the homepage opened with “Build better products with user feedback.” The roadmap line is “Your roadmap is created automatically as you set the status of feature requests from your users and your own teams.” The changelog line is “When you mark features as completed, we'll automatically notify all of your users who have requested the idea.” Status change and notify-on-ship are one loop.

Company: Noora AB, Sweden. The about page says “Noora was founded in Sweden in 2019.” Pricing and homepage footers read “©2019-2025 Noora AB” and “Made in” Sweden and the EU. Fair strengths from those pages:

• Public voting and discussion — feature upvoting and comment likes lead the homepage list
• Admin merge, tags, assign, pin, moderation, and vote on behalf — listed under admin, not as a separate suite
• Anonymous feedback — on the homepage list and on every pricing plan
• Changelog — a WYSIWYG editor, a link back to the request, and notify-on-ship when a request is completed

Do not call this a mobile SDK suite. The job they describe is a feedback board, a roadmap built from statuses, and a changelog that tells requesters when the idea shipped. Homepage counters that day: “500+ SaaS teams,” “2M+ Feedback items,” and “★ 4.8 on Capterra.” The star line is their badge. This draft did not open Capterra. About-page facts are a different scale: “11k + Ideas Posted,” “53k + Votes Collected,” “153k + User Interactions.” Do not reconcile 2M+ feedback items with 11k ideas.

Customers quoted on the homepage and the pricing page include Nadia Odunayo, Founder and CEO at The StoryGraph; Slav Ivanov, Co-Founder at Encharge, who says “our public roadmap is now shared there, too”; and Niels Wetterberg, CEO at Invisible Walls, creators of First Class Trouble. Those lines are about a public board, not a score for this article.

This is not the ProductLift post

Noora is not ProductLift. Noora’s about page says “Noora was founded in Sweden in 2019,” the pricing footer reads “©2019-2025 Noora AB,” and neither the homepage, the Canny-alternative page, nor the pricing page mentions ProductLift. The Feedjolt article on ProductLift is a different product: ProductLift alternative for indie SaaS feedback boards. Do not reuse that outline, those prices, or that proof here.

What the pricing page showed on 2026-09-30

Opened noorahq.com/pricing on 2026-09-30. The HTML has no monthly toggle and no monthly numbers. Each visible price says “Billed annually.” Above the table: “Pay yearly and get 6 months free!” That’s a yearly-billing discount, not a monthly price. Monthly is unknown.

The only plan prices in that HTML, each labeled USD / month and “Billed annually”:

• Startup: $14 USD / month, billed annually
• Growth: $29 USD / month, billed annually, marked “Most popular”
• Enterprise: $64 USD / month, billed annually

There is no fourth dollar on that table and no monthly price beside these three. Monthly is unknown. The 6-months-free line is their yearly slogan, not a calculator, and this article will not turn it into a monthly figure.

All three plans list unlimited tracked contacts and unlimited team members. You do not buy a bigger contact pack to leave Startup. You buy a longer feature list. That is why a flat-price feedback board search often lands here: the meter on the 2026-09-30 table is not “per tracked user.” It is which features sit behind Growth or Enterprise.

Startup vs Growth vs Enterprise is a feature gate

On 2026-09-30 these were on all three plans: feedback boards, roadmap, changelog, anonymous feedback, Zapier, Slack, and Intercom. Startup is a real board, not a teaser.

Growth and Enterprise add the rows Startup does not have: private feedback boards, private notes, “Identify users via SSO,” advanced user segmentation, custom domain, custom roadmap statuses, custom changelog labels, Developer API, and Segment. Enterprise alone adds custom CSS, “Remove Powered By Noora,” and pay by invoice.

So the honest answers, from the table and not from a feature dump:

• Custom roadmap statuses start on Growth, not Startup. Startup still has a roadmap. It does not have that row.
• SSO starts on Growth, not Startup. The row is “Identify users via SSO.”
• Private boards and a custom domain start on Growth. Anonymous feedback, which is different, is on all three.
• White label is Enterprise only. “Remove Powered By Noora” and custom CSS are not Growth rows. The Developer API and Segment are Growth and Enterprise. Zapier on Startup is not the API.

Growth at $29 billed annually is the “Most popular” card because that is where custom statuses, SSO, private boards, and your own domain turn on. Enterprise at $64 billed annually adds custom CSS, removing the Noora mark, and pay by invoice. Startup at $14 billed annually is the public board, roadmap, changelog, anonymous feedback, and Zapier, Slack, and Intercom. None of those three figures is a monthly price.

Trial, cancel, tracked contacts, non-profits

The pricing page states: “Free 7-day trial. No credit card required. Cancel anytime.” On all plans you can upgrade, downgrade, or cancel anytime. There is no permanent free plan in that HTML. The trial is seven days.

FAQ: a tracked contact is a user that comments, votes, or posts. Cancel keeps access for the period already paid. Cards go through Stripe. Non-profits and open source: contact them and “we will most likely grant you free access.” No percent and no promised tier.

Homepage promises vs the plan table

The homepage lists a wide set. Confirmed that day: feature upvoting, comment likes, private boards, anonymous users, custom domain, single sign-on, SSO redirect, embed, dark mode, custom CSS, custom statuses, cover images, estimated dates, notify users, a WYSIWYG changelog editor, YouTube, Loom, and GIPHY, moderation, vote on behalf, pin comments, merge and move, assign posts, tags, API access, white labelling, an analytics dashboard, Intercom, Slack, Zapier (their line says 1,000+ apps), Segment, and a Chrome extension.

Private boards, custom domain, SSO, custom statuses, the Developer API, and Segment are not Startup rows. Custom CSS and “Remove Powered By Noora” are Enterprise. White labelling on the homepage is that Enterprise claim, not a Startup feature. If you buy Startup because the homepage listed SSO or custom statuses, you bought the list, not the row.

If a homepage item is not a row on the pricing table, the plan is unknown. Cover images, estimated dates, comment likes, dark mode, embed, SSO redirect, YouTube, Loom, GIPHY, the Chrome extension, vote on behalf, pin comments, and the analytics dashboard are not separate pricing rows. Do not assign them to a plan from memory.

Jira, Linear, GitHub, and NPS are not pricing-table rows. “Linear” in the homepage HTML is CSS, not an integration. The written integrations are Intercom, Slack, Zapier, and Segment, plus a Chrome extension. Segment is Growth and Enterprise. Intercom, Slack, and Zapier are on all three plans.

Noora vs Canny, their compare page only

For noora vs canny, use their compare page for positioning, not for today’s price. The money source is the pricing page: Startup $14, Growth $29, Enterprise $64, each billed annually. This article will not smooth the disagreement into a monthly price.

What the compare page claims, in their words: fixed priced plans “starting from as little as $29”; you are not charged per active user; “Noora will always be cheaper than Canny.” The “always cheaper” line is their claim, not a checked fact. Canny’s current price is unknown. We didn’t check Canny’s current pricing for this article. The compare page also names a Canny base plan and a higher minimum, and its table header pairs another Noora figure with a Canny figure. Those extra dollar lines are not the pricing page’s annual prices of $14, $29, and $64, so they are not repeated here. On the pricing page, $29 is Growth, billed annually. On the compare page, $29 is a “starting from” line. They are not the same sentence.

Product claims on that compare page that do not depend on the extra numbers:

• Custom statuses versus a fixed set. They contrast Canny’s fixed statuses with Noora’s custom roadmap statuses. On the pricing table, custom statuses start on Growth, not Startup. The compare page does not spell that gate.
• Feedback off the public board. They describe email, support-ticket, and Slack insights that “are not shown on your public boards,” and say the note need not be a feature request.
• “Data hosted in the EU” is marked yes for Noora on that table. The pricing page does not repeat it. Keep it as a compare-page claim.

A Feedjolt-side note that stays on flat workspace and HITL, without borrowing Noora’s compare-page arithmetic, is Feedjolt vs Canny. It is not a substitute for re-reading Canny’s own pricing the week you buy.

Which job you are actually buying

Rows, not a podium. Stay with Noora for anonymous feedback, unlimited tracked contacts, Slack, Intercom, and Zapier on every paid plan, plus a public roadmap and notify-on-ship — and pay Growth if you need custom statuses, SSO, private boards, or your own domain. Look at a hosted HITL board when the job is public feedback, voting, a roadmap, a changelog, and MCP with a human decision, and you do not need Noora’s SSO, segmentation, or white label.

Question	Noora (noorahq.com), 2026-09-30 pricing page	Hosted HITL board (Feedjolt)
What the board is for	Public voting, discussion, a roadmap filled from statuses, changelog notify-on-ship	Public feedback, voting, a public roadmap, a changelog
Visible annual prices	Startup $14, Growth $29, Enterprise $64 USD / month, billed annually. Monthly unknown	No Feedjolt dollar in this article. Confirm the live homepage
Contacts and seats	Unlimited tracked contacts and unlimited team members on all three	Not a per-contact meter in this article. No invented Feedjolt price
Anonymous feedback	On Startup, Growth, and Enterprise	Not claimed. Do not shop Feedjolt as anonymous voting
Custom statuses, SSO, private boards, custom domain	Growth and Enterprise, not Startup	Not claimed. SSO, segmentation, and white label are not Feedjolt promises on this page
Custom CSS and remove powered-by	Enterprise only	Custom CSS is not claimed
Slack, Intercom, Zapier	All three plans	Intercom is not claimed.
Agents	Not described as MCP with a human decision on the pages cited here	MCP: agents propose, a human decides
When it fails	You needed custom statuses or SSO and you bought Startup, or you needed the compare page’s dollars to match the pricing page	You needed anonymous feedback, SSO, user segmentation, custom CSS, or white label as the reason to buy

Peers only where the shape differs: Feature Upvote meters per board, and FeedBear is the simple flat board. Neither changes the Noora fact that custom statuses and SSO start on Growth. If you are still choosing the job, read how to choose a feedback board. The board-plus-roadmap-plus-changelog pattern is in one short companion.

Where Feedjolt places

Feedjolt is a hosted HITL voting board: public feedback, voting, a public roadmap, and a changelog. MCP lets an agent propose and a human decide what becomes the public record. It is not a suite. There is no Feedjolt dollar figure here.

This page does not claim native mobile SDKs, suite modules, SSO, a knowledge base, anonymous voting, custom CSS, user segmentation, or Intercom. SSO and segmentation are Noora Growth rows. Custom CSS is Enterprise. Intercom and anonymous feedback are on every Noora plan. They are not Feedjolt claims.

Noora already has voting, a status-built roadmap, and notify-on-ship. Feedjolt is that public job with a human on the merge: agents can propose, and they do not publish the roadmap alone. Pick Noora when anonymous feedback, unlimited contacts, and Slack, Intercom, and Zapier on Startup are the buy, and pay Growth at the annual $29 display when custom statuses, SSO, private boards, or a custom domain are required. Pick Feedjolt when you want public feedback, voting, a roadmap, a changelog, and MCP, and you do not need Noora’s SSO, segmentation, or white label. Run both only if those Noora gates and a separate board of record both matter. Pick neither alone for a CRM.

FAQ

What is a practical noora alternative if the job is public voting plus a roadmap?

A practical noora alternative is a hosted voting board with a public roadmap, not a clone of Noora’s admin list. Noora’s own board is the straightforward buy when you want anonymous feedback, unlimited tracked contacts, Slack, Intercom, Zapier, and notify-on-ship: Startup $14, Growth $29 for custom statuses, SSO, private boards, or a custom domain, Enterprise $64 for custom CSS, powered-by removal, or pay by invoice, all USD / month billed annually on 2026-09-30. Feedjolt is the board when the job is public feedback, voting, a roadmap, a changelog, and MCP where a human decides. It is not a second copy of Noora, and it is not the ProductLift article.

Noora vs Canny: what does Noora claim, and which prices are stale?

On noora vs canny, Noora’s compare page claims fixed plans starting from as little as $29, no per-active-user charge, custom statuses against a fixed set, off-board notes from email, tickets, and Slack, and data hosted in the EU. Those are their claims. The pricing page the same day shows Startup $14, Growth $29, and Enterprise $64, billed annually, and no monthly figure. The compare page’s other dollar lines are not repeated here and are not Canny’s current price, which is unknown. Do not choose on that arithmetic.

What does a noorahq feedback board include on Startup, and what waits?

A noorahq feedback board on Startup includes unlimited tracked contacts, unlimited team members, feedback boards, a roadmap, a changelog, anonymous feedback, Zapier, Slack, and Intercom, at $14 USD / month billed annually, plus a 7-day trial and no credit card. Private boards, private notes, identify-users-via-SSO, segmentation, a custom domain, custom roadmap statuses, custom changelog labels, the Developer API, and Segment start on Growth at $29 billed annually. Custom CSS, “Remove Powered By Noora,” and pay by invoice wait for Enterprise at $64 billed annually. Homepage items that are not rows have an unknown plan. Non-profit access is “most likely,” with no percent printed.

CTA

Decide the job before the feature list. Noora for anonymous feedback, unlimited contacts, and notify-on-ship, with Growth when statuses, SSO, private boards, or a domain must be yours. Feedjolt for a hosted HITL voting board: public feedback, voting, a public roadmap, a changelog, and MCP with a human decision. No invented Feedjolt price. Homepage only:

https://www.feedjolt.com/?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=seo-noora-alternative